By SHAUN RICHMAN
The vast right-wing network of Koch brother-funded “think tanks” is now plotting to finish off the public-sector Labor Movement once and for all.
In a series of fundraising documents obtained by the Center for Media and Democracy of Madison, WI, and published in the Guardian, the CEO of a cartel of 66 well-funded arch-conservative state capitol lobbying outfits promises funders a “once-in-a-lifetime chance to reverse the failed policies of the American left.”
Tracie Sharp, the leader of the States Policy Network (SPN), goes on to explain that the pathway to permanent right-wing victory is to “defund and defang” unions that rely on the legal protections of state labor law.
Though less well-known, the SPN is something of a sister organization to the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), which writes cookie cutter “model legislation” for right-wing state legislators.
SPN affiliates, like Michigan’s Mackinac Center and Ohio’s Buckeye Institute, promote ALEC’s agenda in the public sphere and attack organizations that are opposed to it. Both networks have effectively nationalized the conservative agenda in state legislatures.
THE 1% SOLUTION
What’s fueling this drive is a combination of the vast sums of money that flow into elections in the Citizens United-era along with the gerrymandering that has helped rig elections in favor of Republicans.
The result has frequently been “triple crown” GOP-led state governments (as is the case in Missouri) that hold little accountability to voters but tremendous debts to their corporate masters.
University of Oregon professor Gordon Lafer has documented the rise of the corporate legislative agenda in all 50 states in his new book, The One Percent Solution: How Corporations Are Remaking America One State at a Time.
Lafer found that state bills pushed by ALEC and the SPN, along with more traditional business lobbyists like the Chamber of Commerce, generally fall into four broad categories:
1. DESTROY LABOR UNIONS
The first, and most obvious, are efforts to constrain or destroy institutions that empower working people to fight back, such as labor unions.
2. PRIVATIZE PUBLIC SERVICES
Second are efforts to privatize public services. Lafer found these efforts were primarily intended to diffuse the responsibility of providing these services.
“If no public authority is responsible,” he writes, “demands become customer-service issues rather than policy problems that must be addressed by democratically accountable officials.”
3. BLOCK CITIES FROM PASSING LIVING WAGE OR FAIR SCHEDULING LAWS
Third are efforts to block – or pre-empt – rebel cities from passing living wage or fair scheduling laws, thereby foreclosing on the ability of localities to defend and advance progressive goals.
(EDITOR’S NOTE: This happened earlier this year in Missouri when the State Legislature and Gov. Eric Greitens rolled back St. Louis’ $10 minimum wage and blocked a voter-approved $15 minimum wage from taking effect in Kansas City.)
4. TAX CUTS FOR THE WEALTHY, AUSTERITY CUTS TO PUBLIC SERVICES
Finally, through tax cuts for the wealthy and austerity-driven cuts to vital public services, Lafer found that this corporate agenda seeks a downward shift in what people come to expect for a basic standard-of-living.
In other words, the 1%’s solution is to convince the rest of us, as the Dead Kennedys song goes, that soup is good food; that each new indignity is simply our new standard of living and that we shouldn’t expect more.
AS A POLITICAL PLOY
If the States Policy Network does really strive for this 1% goal outlined by Lafer, then it’s no wonder that the group has been most dogged in pursuing its union-busting agenda. SPN and ALEC have long understood what many Democratic politicians are only just beginning to realize: strong unions help keep right-wing politicians out of office while protecting the social safety net.
SPN and ALEC have aggressively pursued so-called “right-to-work” legislation as a means of bankrupting unions and knocking out a key component of their opponents’ get-out-the-vote operation.
Twenty-eight states now have these anti-union laws on the books. Five of them – all former bedrocks of union power – were passed this decade as a part of the anti-union drive described in the documents released by the Center for Media and Democracy.
UNSOLICITED UNION BUSTERS
That’s hardly the extent of the role of these “think tanks” in busting unions. Flush with cash, they’ve begun volunteering their efforts as union avoidance consultants where no one has asked for their services.
In 2013, I was part of a drive to organize the workers at Chicago’s United Neighborhood Organization Charter School Network, under the terms of a neutrality agreement.
The employer was getting rocked by a financial and insider dealing scandal that was a daily cover story in the local media. The schools’ employees joining the Chicago Alliance of Charter Teachers and Staff (ACTS) was the only positive headline they had to look forward to when we launched the card drive.
That didn’t stop an SPN affiliate, the Illinois Policy Institute (IPI), from harvesting teachers’ email addresses and spamming UNO’s e-mail lists with condescending admonitions to “not sign any union petition or authorization card unless you are certain that you want union representation.”
These union busters seemed to assume that the “launch” of our card drive meant a bunch of beefy goons were about to descend on the schools to strong-arm teachers. In fact, the public launch of the card drive was the union organizing equivalent of a touchdown dance. The representative, democratic organizing committee we had spent weeks training, educating and empowering signed up over 90 percent of their colleagues in time for a May Day card count certification.
GETTING READY TO DESTROY UNIONS
The Illinois Policy Institute is better prepared in the pending Supreme Court case, Janus vs. AFSCME. Originating from Illinois, the case is a blatant do-over of the craven attempt to turn the entire public sector Labor Movement “right-to-work,” previously pushed in the Friedrichs case.
Should the Supreme Court vote to make union fees voluntary, the IPI and its sister organizations are prepared to run the mother of all “open shop” drives. They will likely FOIA the names and as much contact information as possible of every union-represented public sector worker and inundate them with glossy materials encouraging them to “give yourself a raise” by quitting the union.
HOW TO FIGHT BACK
The revelation of the SPN’s nakedly partisan agenda should open every one of its affiliates to challenges over their status as tax-deductible educational charities. These challenges are worth pursuing, if only to delegitimize their role in public debates. But this won’t really affect their bottom line — their funders have so much money they hardly need the tax breaks for donating to their favorite political causes.
In preparation for the post-Janus attacks, public sector unions should behave more like Chicago ACTS and confound the SPN’s moldy old assumptions about the source of union power.
To do this, we need to:
• Greatly increase members’ democratic involvement in their unions. The slick “give yourself a raise” pamphlets will do the most damage in places where members think of the union as simply a headquarters building downtown. If that’s the extent of their interaction, workers could fall for the cheap trick of blaming the union for the stagnant wages and reduction in benefits that are actually the direct result of the GOP’s corporate agenda.
• Where members are involved in formulating demands and participating in protest actions, they find the true value and power of being in a union. That power — the power of an active and involved membership — is what the right-wing most fears, and is doing everything in its power to stop.
(Shaun Richman is a former organizing director for the American Federation of Teachers and a contributing editor to In These Times. His Twitter handle is @Ess_Dog. Reprinted from In These Times.)