Illinois judge tosses right-wing challenge to pro-worker constitutional amendment

0
396
PROMOTING WORKERS’ RIGHTS: Members of the Southwestern Illinois Central Labor Council proclaimed their support for Amendment 1, the Workers Rights Amendment, at the Council’s annual Labor Day parade and picnic at Hough Park. Supporting the amendment were (from left) Council trustee Jeff Collier, Executive Recording Secretary Marcia Campbell, Council trustee Mary Laurent and Financial Secretary-Treasurer Charles Kaemmerer. – Labor Tribune photo

Springfield, IL (PAI) – Illinois Circuit Court Judge Raylene DeWitte Grischow has rejected a right-wing challenge to the proposed amendment to write workers’ collective bargaining rights into the state’s constitution. The proposed Workers Rights Amendment, which will appear on the ballot as Amendment 1, also outlaws so-called state and local “right-to-work” laws.

Writing in The Labor Paper of Peoria, analyst Bill Knight reported Judge Grischow, a Republican sitting in the state capital of Springfield, ruled Illinois could spend money to list the Workers’ Rights Amendment, Amendment 1, on this fall’s ballot in the Land of Lincoln.

If voters OK the amendment, Illinois would be one of the few states with such a guarantee in its constitution, and the only one with a “right-to-work” ban, too.

Specifically, the amendment “would establish a constitutional right for (Illinois) employees to organize and bargain collectively through representatives of their choice to ‘negotiate wages, hours and working conditions and to protect their economic welfare and safety at work,’” Knight wrote.

RIGHT-WING ‘THINK TANK’
The so-called Liberty Justice Center, a right-wing “think tank”/advocacy group, brought the case. The center and its allies also argued the federal National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) pre-empted — overrode — any state actions on collective bargaining.

Judge Grischow tossed out that argument, too.

There are “no reasonable grounds” for keeping Amendment 1 off the fall ballot, she wrote. “Some parts of the amendment were clearly not pre-empted” by the NLRA, she added.

The right-wing center’s “arguments fail as a matter of law and impermissibly seek an advisory opinion” from the courts “as to constitutional issues which may never progress beyond the realm of the hypothetical.

‘NO BASIS’
“There is no basis for denying the voters the opportunity to decide whether to enact a state right to collective bargaining as a supplement or backup to rights secured by the federal NLRA.”

Judge Grischow said the proposed amendment has three purposes:

  1. Creating worker rights for public workers.
  2. To restrain the Illinois General Assembly from passing laws restricting union-security agreements – the “right-to-work” laws.
  3. To “serve as a state law fail-safe should the federal government ever decide to abandon the NLRA.”

The right-wing center drew support from several groups that tried to halt the amendment in the Illinois Legislature. They included the Illinois Chamber of Commerce, the Illinois Association of Manufacturers and the National Federation of Independent Business, a key cog in the nationwide corporate-financed anti-worker right-wing coalition.

And through another right-wing “think tank,” the Liberty Justice Center, which is allied with the National Right To Work Committee, a virulent hater of workers and unions.

That committee financed the infamous Janus case, also from Illinois. There, the U.S. Supreme Court’s five-Justice Republican majority ruled five years ago that every single state and local government worker in the U.S. could be a potential “free rider,” able to use union protections, services and benefits without paying one red cent for them.

DOOR-TO-DOOR CAMPAIGN
Starting with mass rallies several months ago in Peoria and Collinsville, Ill. unions and their allies are waging an intensive campaign to get the measure into the state constitution. Now unionists are going house-to-house and door-to-door to convince the state’s voters to approve it. It needs either 60 percent of those voting in its own balloting or 50-percent-plus-one of the overall election turnout to win.

Judge Grischow’s ruling is a key victory in an election where experts expect billionaires will spend millions of dollars to attack workers’ rights in general and Amendment 1 in particular, Knight wrote. The heavily Democratic State Senate voted 49-7 for the amendment and the State House agreed, 80-30. Grischow’s ruling can be appealed upwards in Illinois courts.

‘BETTER STANDARD OF LIVING’
“I personally always have had a better standard of living when working a union job and (have) not been afraid to speak up to management when I’ve had safety concerns for myself and/or co-workers. All workers deserve such benefits,” Lisa Renski of Letter Carriers Local 522 in Bloomington, Ill., told The Labor Paper.

Greg Rosenak, an Electrical Workers Local 34 retiree, made the connection between protecting workers rights in Illinois and protecting the right to abortion nationally. Though justices’ names changed, the Republican-named U.S. Supreme Court majority which ruled against unions in the Janus case also discarded the constitutional right to abortion.

“We have seen with the abortion debacle how a few well-placed zealots can forgo the will of the people to forward their own myopic agenda,” Rosenak told The Labor Paper.

“Illinois has long been a stronghold for workers’ rights, with some of the best workers’ comp, safety and unemployment laws protecting the worker,” said Rosenak, whose local covers Peoria, Galesburg and Quincy. “One only needs to think of the last governor”—right-wing Republican Bruce Rauner, clobbered in 2018—“who tried to turn our state into a ‘right-to-work’ state by dividing us,” he explained. “The Workers’ Rights Amendment solidifies workers’ rights for our children’s future and the continuance of living wage jobs in our state.”


 

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here